I’m old enough—just—to remember accounting work before the rise of spreadsheets. We had a accounting ledger system on a mainframe compute to record all the transactions and it could produce printed reports but if you wanted to do any analysis you had to do it by hand. We had stationery called analysis paper which was A3 size, pale blue with a grid pattern in darker blue ink. There were wider cells on the left side and heading and footer rows, too. This stationery made it easier to lay out data in rows and columns but all the sums had to be done with a calculator, at least twice to check they were right. There were no graphs and no sorting on the fly.
Excel is ubiquitous now but in the mid-80s we moved from paper to SuperCalc (I knew some organisations used Lotus-123) and these were spreadsheets that pre-dated the graphical user interface and the mouse. They did not have colours: they were white or green on black depending on your monitor. And we used them like analysis paper, basically summing the numbers in our columns and rows.
Modern spreadsheet packages are massively more powerful with all types of arithmetic, financial, scientific, statistical and database functions built in. Indeed, there are more functions than most users are aware of. My point with this blog post, though, is not to explain some esoteric function but to address the fact that accountants (and others) are not trained in financial modelling. Instead of adhering to some basic standards or principles for all their work people lay out each spreadsheet to solve the problem they have right now. This is OK as long as no-one else is collaborating on the spreadsheet or, at some later date, asked to update it. At times like that the lack of standardisation means it is very difficult to understand how the spreadsheet works and it might be easier for the person to build a new spreadsheet from scratch—using their idiosyncratic style, of course—than update the old one.
One way to envisage what I mean is to think about a paper notebook. Your notebook is yours and it does not matter how you choose to keep notes at meetings. Your notes could jump around from topic to topic, mix words, numbers and pictures, have asides, scribbles and crossings-out but that does not stop you from being able to remember what you need to remember. In my experience most people create spreadsheets in much the same way. They start at the top left of the sheet and add things as they think of them. They are not thinking of future users as they build the spreadsheet.
But there is a better way. Some organisations do have standards for financial modelling so that there is consistency in the work produced by their staff. This makes good business sense since it saves time, enables quality control to be implemented consistently and, I reckon, reduces errors. (Errors in spreadsheets are legion and can be costly, either in money or reputation.)
In the absence of financial modelling standards in your organisation, here are five tips, or principles, that you can adopt in your spreadsheets. Although I mention Excel throughout they would equally work on Google Sheets, Apple's Numbers, or Open Office spreadsheets.